I was reading a friend's latest blog entry a few minutes ago and I've just realized my last entry here was some time in early 2009 or so. Things had been taking a decidedly political turn, and I'm not sure that's the direction I want to go. I'm not really concerned about my readers, because I'm fairly certain I don't have any, but this is something I feel is important to do for myself, and to that end I'm going to try to start being a more regular visitor to my own blog once again.
Let's see how that pans out, shall we?
Monday, June 28, 2010
Monday, June 15, 2009
Iranian People Shine In the Face of Dirty Politics
I've been caught up in the drama of the Iranian presidential election for the past couple of weeks. After seeing the enthusiasm of the candidates, the voters, the debates, it was hard not to feel excited for them, and with a reported turnout of something like 85%, Iranian voters have certainly shamed voters in democracies around the world, including the United States and most notably the European Union with it's abysmal 43.3% showing in 2009 parliamentary elections.
The words, deeds and faces of everyday Iranians spoke of their excitement to be participating in the process of government, their hopes for a bright future and their desire to have their voices heard. In the face of that excitement, hope and desire, the cloud of suspicion surrounding the election results announced Saturday morning, and the attempts by Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the allegedly re-elected president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to assert his "landslide victory" make this story a tragedy for all the people of Iran. Although hard evidence is difficult to obtain, the seated government's claim that the incumbent won the majority of the vote in every demographic is simply beyond all rational belief. As an example, imagine that in the last U.S. presidential election the Democratic party took every single state. It's totally preposterous. Add to that the fact that supporters of the opposition candidate, Mir-Hossein Mousavi, have taken to the streets in the hundreds of thousands, and you begin to get a clear picture of the scale of this deception.
This is a sad time for all Iranians. Protesters can be seen in the streets of Tehran and around the world carrying signs that say "Where Is My Vote?." You don't have to be a Mousavi supporter to ask this question- if the election results were fraudulent, tampered with in any way, then no one's vote matters. Supporters of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad take note: this election, and the importance of your vote, has been stolen from you as surely as it has been stolen from the Mousavi supporters. Which would you rather have, a voice that matters in the future of Iran, or Ahmadi re-elected at any cost? Think about that carefully, and understand that victory at any cost will likely cost you democracy itself. If you truly love Iran, and your part in shaping it's future, you will take to the streets and join your fellow Iranians to demand that your voice be heard and your vote counted.
To all Iranians- I have been inspired by your passion, hope and love for your country, and I'm inspired yet again to see you so bravely standing up for what you think is right. I salute you, and my thoughts are with you.
The words, deeds and faces of everyday Iranians spoke of their excitement to be participating in the process of government, their hopes for a bright future and their desire to have their voices heard. In the face of that excitement, hope and desire, the cloud of suspicion surrounding the election results announced Saturday morning, and the attempts by Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the allegedly re-elected president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to assert his "landslide victory" make this story a tragedy for all the people of Iran. Although hard evidence is difficult to obtain, the seated government's claim that the incumbent won the majority of the vote in every demographic is simply beyond all rational belief. As an example, imagine that in the last U.S. presidential election the Democratic party took every single state. It's totally preposterous. Add to that the fact that supporters of the opposition candidate, Mir-Hossein Mousavi, have taken to the streets in the hundreds of thousands, and you begin to get a clear picture of the scale of this deception.
This is a sad time for all Iranians. Protesters can be seen in the streets of Tehran and around the world carrying signs that say "Where Is My Vote?." You don't have to be a Mousavi supporter to ask this question- if the election results were fraudulent, tampered with in any way, then no one's vote matters. Supporters of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad take note: this election, and the importance of your vote, has been stolen from you as surely as it has been stolen from the Mousavi supporters. Which would you rather have, a voice that matters in the future of Iran, or Ahmadi re-elected at any cost? Think about that carefully, and understand that victory at any cost will likely cost you democracy itself. If you truly love Iran, and your part in shaping it's future, you will take to the streets and join your fellow Iranians to demand that your voice be heard and your vote counted.
To all Iranians- I have been inspired by your passion, hope and love for your country, and I'm inspired yet again to see you so bravely standing up for what you think is right. I salute you, and my thoughts are with you.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Suppression of Information Is Not Transparency
sup·press
1: to put down by authority or force : subdue2: to keep from public knowledge: as a: to keep secret b: to stop or prohibit the publication or revelation of
source: Mirriam-Webster Online (emphasis mine)
Dear President Obama,
I am writing to you today to express my disappointment at your stated intention to suppress the release of photos showing prisoner abuse by the military. Is this the greater transparency in government you promised?
Sincerely,
Brian Cournoyer
____________________________________________________
So what's the deal here? I won't go as far as the ACLU and say this makes a mockery of Obama's promises about greater transparency in government, but I'm really not happy about it. He cites military leaders who say that releasing these photos will put the lives of American soldiers at risk. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the lives of American soldiers are already at risk as long as we're at war aren't they? That just doesn't wash with me. And the other reason given, that this will damage the image of the U.S. in the eyes of the world, well, it's already in the toilet, isn't it? The rest of the world already knows these photos exist. Suppressing them just makes it look as though we're trying to cover up our dirty deeds again. Which is exactly what this amounts to.
You can hide your shit by kicking dirt on it, but it still stinks.
Seems as though this administration is back-pedaling on a lot of issues pertaining to this sort of thing- the release of evidence relevant to the treatment of detainees, the investigation of the torture, yes torture - "enhanced interrogation" my fucking ass - conducted by Dick Cheney and his band of merry inquisitors. Our fearless leader has come out and said himself that waterboarding is torture, and therefore in violation of both U.S. law and the Geneva Convention, but we're not going to prosecute anyone (or even try to discover the truth about what happened, who knew what and when?) because it's traditionally taboo to criticize previous administrations? Seriously? Wow.
But back to the photos. OK, maybe he spoke to his advisers and thought better of releasing them. Fine. Maybe, Mr. President, next time you should consult your advisers BEFORE you make these bold sweeping and lofty statements. Case in point- Guantanamo Bay. The senate is now going to withhold funding for it's closure because you still have no clear plan of what to do with the prisoners still held there. And rightfully so. I'm not keen to see $80 million of taxpayer money allotted to a project that has no plan to move forward on. So yes, it was great to see you issue an executive order to close the facility by next year, something the overwhelming majority of voters wanted from you, but what good is it if it never happens? And now we're going to start up the military trials dog-and-pony show again too? Yay! Another mockery of the American justice system and brain(?)child of the Bush administration finds new life.
I still think you're doing a good job on lots of things, Mr. President, and I still support you, but covering up the truth has never done anyone any good, and it doesn't seem likely to start now. If you suppress the truth you've lost the moral high ground, and it's the moral high ground that supported the platform on which you were elected. It's called the Freedom of Information Act for a reason.
1: to put down by authority or force : subdue
source: Mirriam-Webster Online (emphasis mine)
Dear President Obama,
I am writing to you today to express my disappointment at your stated intention to suppress the release of photos showing prisoner abuse by the military. Is this the greater transparency in government you promised?
Sincerely,
Brian Cournoyer
____________________________________________________
So what's the deal here? I won't go as far as the ACLU and say this makes a mockery of Obama's promises about greater transparency in government, but I'm really not happy about it. He cites military leaders who say that releasing these photos will put the lives of American soldiers at risk. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the lives of American soldiers are already at risk as long as we're at war aren't they? That just doesn't wash with me. And the other reason given, that this will damage the image of the U.S. in the eyes of the world, well, it's already in the toilet, isn't it? The rest of the world already knows these photos exist. Suppressing them just makes it look as though we're trying to cover up our dirty deeds again. Which is exactly what this amounts to.
You can hide your shit by kicking dirt on it, but it still stinks.
Seems as though this administration is back-pedaling on a lot of issues pertaining to this sort of thing- the release of evidence relevant to the treatment of detainees, the investigation of the torture, yes torture - "enhanced interrogation" my fucking ass - conducted by Dick Cheney and his band of merry inquisitors. Our fearless leader has come out and said himself that waterboarding is torture, and therefore in violation of both U.S. law and the Geneva Convention, but we're not going to prosecute anyone (or even try to discover the truth about what happened, who knew what and when?) because it's traditionally taboo to criticize previous administrations? Seriously? Wow.
But back to the photos. OK, maybe he spoke to his advisers and thought better of releasing them. Fine. Maybe, Mr. President, next time you should consult your advisers BEFORE you make these bold sweeping and lofty statements. Case in point- Guantanamo Bay. The senate is now going to withhold funding for it's closure because you still have no clear plan of what to do with the prisoners still held there. And rightfully so. I'm not keen to see $80 million of taxpayer money allotted to a project that has no plan to move forward on. So yes, it was great to see you issue an executive order to close the facility by next year, something the overwhelming majority of voters wanted from you, but what good is it if it never happens? And now we're going to start up the military trials dog-and-pony show again too? Yay! Another mockery of the American justice system and brain(?)child of the Bush administration finds new life.
I still think you're doing a good job on lots of things, Mr. President, and I still support you, but covering up the truth has never done anyone any good, and it doesn't seem likely to start now. If you suppress the truth you've lost the moral high ground, and it's the moral high ground that supported the platform on which you were elected. It's called the Freedom of Information Act for a reason.
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Music and Nazis and White Supremacists, Oh My!
Ok. So it was recently pointed out to me that one of my all-time favorite social networks, Last.fm, was home to a number of neo-nazi groups, and were listing neo-nazi, white power, etc, oriented bands in their music catalog. What's a peace-loving, granola munching Skinny Puppy fan to do? My first reaction was that I didn't want to be associated with anything that gave a voice to this sort of hate-mongering, and I still feel very strongly about that. I decided I was going to vacate the premeses, with a quick note to my friends and a polite but disappointed email to the administrators of said network, and after a lot of flip-flopping and thinking it over, I started writing.
I expected to get a few replies, and was rather shocked at the amount of response I got. Everyone was very polite, and very kindly sorry to see me go, but the general opinion was pretty much unanimous- how can I say I support the right to free speech if I don't extend that to include nazis, even if they are completely retarded shitheads. Was I not contradicting myself? Well, it's a bit more complicated than that, but the short answer is: Yes, I was.
All of you are pretty much dead-on. Freedom of speech, freedom of expression, all the freedoms I purport to defend, are meaningless if I don't extend them to include everyone, even those who exploit that freedom in an effort to deprive others of it. I let my disgust get the better of me this time, and it nearly made a hypocrite of me, so thanks to all of you who pointed that out to me.
So my decision is this: I plan to keep my Last.fm account (which, to be perfectly honest I was REALLY loathe to delete). I also plan to write an email to Last.fm expressing my deep unhappiness at the presence of these hate-groups (for that is what they are), because expressing my opinion of things is MY right, too. My problem with these groups is that their belief system is oriented toward denying the basic human rights of others, based on misinformation, hatred and lies. Should anyone be able to say whatever they want, even if it's harmful to others, and without any basis in fact? I honestly don't know, and that's where I get into this gray area and start feeling like I'm contradicting myself. Right at the moment, I think I'm making the best choice, and feel like my earlier decision was hasty and not thought through enough.
So there you have it. Thanks to everyone who wrote back to me. Feel free to write again. What do you think now? Am I making the right decision? Or am I just a schizo? I'm thinking the latter, but at least I feel a little better. For now... :P
I expected to get a few replies, and was rather shocked at the amount of response I got. Everyone was very polite, and very kindly sorry to see me go, but the general opinion was pretty much unanimous- how can I say I support the right to free speech if I don't extend that to include nazis, even if they are completely retarded shitheads. Was I not contradicting myself? Well, it's a bit more complicated than that, but the short answer is: Yes, I was.
All of you are pretty much dead-on. Freedom of speech, freedom of expression, all the freedoms I purport to defend, are meaningless if I don't extend them to include everyone, even those who exploit that freedom in an effort to deprive others of it. I let my disgust get the better of me this time, and it nearly made a hypocrite of me, so thanks to all of you who pointed that out to me.
So my decision is this: I plan to keep my Last.fm account (which, to be perfectly honest I was REALLY loathe to delete). I also plan to write an email to Last.fm expressing my deep unhappiness at the presence of these hate-groups (for that is what they are), because expressing my opinion of things is MY right, too. My problem with these groups is that their belief system is oriented toward denying the basic human rights of others, based on misinformation, hatred and lies. Should anyone be able to say whatever they want, even if it's harmful to others, and without any basis in fact? I honestly don't know, and that's where I get into this gray area and start feeling like I'm contradicting myself. Right at the moment, I think I'm making the best choice, and feel like my earlier decision was hasty and not thought through enough.
So there you have it. Thanks to everyone who wrote back to me. Feel free to write again. What do you think now? Am I making the right decision? Or am I just a schizo? I'm thinking the latter, but at least I feel a little better. For now... :P
Monday, April 13, 2009
Amazon's Big Gay Fail
Ok, so this has been the hottest subject of the day and has been talked/Tweeted/blogged to death already, I know, but, dammit, I haven't been inspired to write about anything since January, and the stupidity factor in this story is just too high to be ignored, so here's where I open my mouth for awhile. If you're already sick of the story, you don't have to read me, but you're also not as concerned as you ought to be about your First Amendment rights.
So here's the way I see this: Back in February (and some now say even as far back as August 2008), several authors of gay-themed literature realized their books had been stripped of sales rank on Amazon. This effectively makes them harder to search, and in turn that hurts their overall sales. When the authors inquired about the change, they were told by Amazon execs that the books had been classified as 'adult' material as part of a company policy change' and adult material would not be ranked. Interestingly, this extended to ALL books with a gay, lesbian or bisexual theme, including such classics of porn as "Heather Has Two Mommies," by Leslea Newman, a children's book that deals with a little girl growing up raised by her biological mother and her lesbian partner, as well as the autobiography of Ellen Degeneres...pretty raunchy stuff, eh? Meanwhile, such family fare as "Ron Jeremy: The Hardest (Working) Man in Show Business" maintained it's ranked status. Apparently since Ron wasn't playing Flagpole Sitta with the boys on poker night he's ok. My point is that there is a clear pattern of witch-huntery here.
Amazon's answer to this has been to waffle, back-pedal and clutch at any available straw to lay the blame anywhere but at their own feet. First, a computer glitch was blamed. It must have been quite a sophisticated glitch to send out personalized emails to authors whose books had been effected, and signing the names of company execs. There are a million holes in this story, but the plainest one of all is that software is useful, software is flexible, software is adaptable...but software is not bigoted unless someone programs it to be.
Now to the rescue comes the self-styled "hacker," who claims he engineered the whole thing by creating a script that exploits the fact that a small number of consumer complaints can flag a book as inappropriate, and the book will be automatically stripped of it's rank. Even if this were true, (which I sincerely doubt) and not the opportunistic boast of a delusional wannabe, the fact that it's even possible for a small number (or even a single determined person) to have this sort of influence in deciding what's appropriate for us unwashed masses to see and read is a serious fuck-up on the part of Amazon. This basically means that if I and ten of my closest friends decide that Harold and the Purple Crayon is a thinly-veiled tale of sodomy with writing utensils, we can flag it on Amazon and presto! it will lose it's ranking also. How stupid is that?
So to put it simply, no, I don't buy it. Not a glitch. Not a hack. Not an "error" as they are now insisting. And not a penny more will I spend with them until I hear some truth. What annoys me the most is how hard it is for these people, company execs, politicians, celebrities, what have you, to just throw up their hands and say "Look, we made a very poor, very ill-considered decision, but we've heard you, the public, we accept responsibilty for our mistake and we apologize for any offense that was given. Every effort will be made to correct this problem immediately." Problems should be investigated, causes rooted out, errors should be corrected, and, if warranted, heads should roll. Instead they insult our intelligence by making excuses, generating spin and pointing fingers at anything and anyone but themselves. Am I the only one that would just like to be told the truth for a change?
Censorship is the most objectionable material of all.
So here's the way I see this: Back in February (and some now say even as far back as August 2008), several authors of gay-themed literature realized their books had been stripped of sales rank on Amazon. This effectively makes them harder to search, and in turn that hurts their overall sales. When the authors inquired about the change, they were told by Amazon execs that the books had been classified as 'adult' material as part of a company policy change' and adult material would not be ranked. Interestingly, this extended to ALL books with a gay, lesbian or bisexual theme, including such classics of porn as "Heather Has Two Mommies," by Leslea Newman, a children's book that deals with a little girl growing up raised by her biological mother and her lesbian partner, as well as the autobiography of Ellen Degeneres...pretty raunchy stuff, eh? Meanwhile, such family fare as "Ron Jeremy: The Hardest (Working) Man in Show Business" maintained it's ranked status. Apparently since Ron wasn't playing Flagpole Sitta with the boys on poker night he's ok. My point is that there is a clear pattern of witch-huntery here.
Amazon's answer to this has been to waffle, back-pedal and clutch at any available straw to lay the blame anywhere but at their own feet. First, a computer glitch was blamed. It must have been quite a sophisticated glitch to send out personalized emails to authors whose books had been effected, and signing the names of company execs. There are a million holes in this story, but the plainest one of all is that software is useful, software is flexible, software is adaptable...but software is not bigoted unless someone programs it to be.
Now to the rescue comes the self-styled "hacker," who claims he engineered the whole thing by creating a script that exploits the fact that a small number of consumer complaints can flag a book as inappropriate, and the book will be automatically stripped of it's rank. Even if this were true, (which I sincerely doubt) and not the opportunistic boast of a delusional wannabe, the fact that it's even possible for a small number (or even a single determined person) to have this sort of influence in deciding what's appropriate for us unwashed masses to see and read is a serious fuck-up on the part of Amazon. This basically means that if I and ten of my closest friends decide that Harold and the Purple Crayon is a thinly-veiled tale of sodomy with writing utensils, we can flag it on Amazon and presto! it will lose it's ranking also. How stupid is that?
So to put it simply, no, I don't buy it. Not a glitch. Not a hack. Not an "error" as they are now insisting. And not a penny more will I spend with them until I hear some truth. What annoys me the most is how hard it is for these people, company execs, politicians, celebrities, what have you, to just throw up their hands and say "Look, we made a very poor, very ill-considered decision, but we've heard you, the public, we accept responsibilty for our mistake and we apologize for any offense that was given. Every effort will be made to correct this problem immediately." Problems should be investigated, causes rooted out, errors should be corrected, and, if warranted, heads should roll. Instead they insult our intelligence by making excuses, generating spin and pointing fingers at anything and anyone but themselves. Am I the only one that would just like to be told the truth for a change?
Censorship is the most objectionable material of all.
Saturday, January 3, 2009
What would you do if you lost everything?
This entry is a repost of a blog entry by musician Erica Dunham (Unter Null, Stray), who, on the day after Christmas 2008, lost pretty much everything she owned when the house she lived in with her family burned. Apologies to Erica for being so late in posting this, but if anyone can help in any way, even if you just send her a sympathetic note in the mail, please do.
I hate to do this because I feel like an asshole but as my entire family is currently totally screwed and living out of a hotel and trash-bags:
if you can donate anything:
please either mail me at UNTERNULL@GMAIL.COM
PAYPAL: ERICA@ERICADUNHAM.COM
MY PHONE IS: 253-632-8410
I never have been in a fire and I am terrified for this to ever happen again.
Currently, I am in a hotel room with my mother, father and sister. We found our cat earlier this evening hiding in the tool shed. Our dogs are safe. No lives have been lost.
Current situation: My entire room used as a music studio is gone. It is completely black. My flat-screen monitor is melted into my keyboard. My M-Audio keyboard is, as you see in the post below, some warped Dali-esque thing.
((could now make an art project out of it)
More details as to what I remembered happened:
I went to bed at around 3:30 AM. I took 2 Benedryl as I do every night because I have a problem sleeping. I probably dozed off at around 3:45. I remember putting out the candles that I had lit in my studio previous to going to sleep.
My bed is located right outside the door of my studio ; as I like to separate work/music from bedtime.
In my sleep I was having a waking dream of it being very warm and hearing things pop and crackle and things crash. I think I slowly came to, most likely because of the heat.
The second I opened my eyes I think I realized something was very very wrong.
I flew out of bed, looked to my right (where the door to my studio is) and saw my door ajar with thick black smoke pouring out from the door. It was EXTREMELY hot. I have never felt such heat in my life.
Still in a half-sleep state, half-dream state ( I did not realize I was awake) I tapped the door with my finger to push it open a bit and I was met with a gust of heat, smoke, and flames in my face.
This woke me up completely and I ran like hell away from the room towards the other end of the house (upstairs) screaming "OH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHIT" and I wasn't thinking clearly because this was all happening so fast.
I pounded on my sister's door which was directly across the hall from my studio and yelled 'WAKE UP GET OUT" and ran down the stairs still screaming "OH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHIT"
My father came racing out of my parents' room at the bottom of the stairs compeltely oblivious as to what was going on. He went racing up the stairs and I heard him shout "GET OUT!!!!!!!!" to my sister. My mom came racing out of my parents' room next and had no idea what was going on.
All I could say was 'FIRE FIRE BAD FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE CALL 911! CALL 911! CALL 911!!"
She raced to the phone and dialed and got connected as I ran to the sink and filled a 4-cup measuring cup with water. The water wasn't pouring fast enough into the cup. I had no idea what I was doing at the time, I was at then going on instinct and adrenaline. I raced back up stairs, which was fucking stupid of me, (my sister and dad were now downstairs) and I tried to approach my room. The heat, the smoke, the air was so heavy and hot and dense.. I can't even describe it. It suffocated me and I became dizzy and wanted to sit down. I made it to the door of my studio, opened the door, and the rush of hot air in my face was overw
I hate to do this becau
if you can donat
pleas
PAYPA
MY PHONE
I never
Curre
Curre
(
More detai
I went to bed at aroun
My bed is locat
In my sleep
The secon
I flew out of bed, looke
Still
This woke me up compl
I pound
My fathe
All I could
She raced